I should make a list of FOSS apps, projects, and services that have Fediverse accounts and don't code with AI, then strike them from the list with a big ELIMINATED notice if they do start drinking the slop kool-aid.
EDIT: Made one fedidevs.com/s/MTA2OA/
Esta entrada fue editada (hoy, 5:27)
Trendy Toots reshared this.
Clara 🏳️⚧️
in reply to Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) • • •Greylord
in reply to Clara 🏳️⚧️ • • •Greylord
in reply to Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) • • •screwlisp
in reply to Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) • • •@catsalad
screwlisp
in reply to screwlisp • • •Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch)
in reply to Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) • • •lcamtuf
in reply to Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) • • •Carlos Solís likes this.
Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch)
in reply to lcamtuf • • •lcamtuf
in reply to Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) • • •I'm excused because it's infosec.exchange/@lcamtuf/117339779517868511
lcamtuf
2026-09-26 22:49:04
Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) reshared this.
diana 🏳️⚧️🦋🌱
in reply to lcamtuf • • •@lcamtuf
I remember that very morning in September when AOL started flooding the UseNet Newsgroups with ...umm... slop. The community never recovered.
We can do this. We must do this. The last stand against billionaires and their slop.
Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch)
in reply to diana 🏳️⚧️🦋🌱 • • •Superball ☀️
in reply to lcamtuf • • •Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch)
in reply to Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) • • •So far I know of...
@Codeberg
@elementary
@guix
@microsoft
Wait...
vicente ⁂
in reply to Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) • • •Noah, brought to you by Mutual of Omaha and PBS viewers like you
in reply to Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) • • •2something
in reply to Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) • • •manchicken
in reply to Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) • • •Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch)
in reply to manchicken • • •Carlos Solís
in reply to Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) • •Cassandrich
in reply to Carlos Solís • • •Cassandrich
in reply to Cassandrich • • •LOL why am I not surprised? Get fucked.
Freeeeeeeeeeeeee
in reply to Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) • • •Alexia
in reply to Freeeeeeeeeeeeee • • •@freeplay@catsalad
No, our point isn't to shame projects that use AI, and rather to highlight those which don't.
See starlightnet.work/posts/the-no-ai-list.html which goes over why I started the list and what the approach/philosophy behind it is
the-no-ai-list.html
starlightnet.workCat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) reshared this.
Alexia
in reply to Alexia • • •@freeplay@catsalad
Historically, the projects that got removed from the list fell into one of two categories
- Projects which's ban depended purely on licensing or was a temporary measure (maybe QEMU or OpenJDK in the future)
- Projects which had a policy discussion wherein people which use AI pushed for a more lenient policy (think bevy)
other cases are rare, moreso exceptions than the norm
Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch)
in reply to Alexia • • •ARGVMI~1.PIF
in reply to Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) • • •It doesn't have any “eliminated” notices, but… codeberg.org/brib/slopfree-software-index
See also this list of projects that *do* contain AI-generated code: codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware
slopfree-software-index
Codeberg.orgCat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) reshared this.
Carlos Solís
in reply to ARGVMI~1.PIF • •GIMP
in reply to ARGVMI~1.PIF • • •Amandine reshared this.
Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch)
in reply to GIMP • • •Kien
in reply to Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) • • •Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch)
in reply to Kien • • •Taggart
in reply to Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) • • •Just found this: Fork of KPXC without LLM commits: codeberg.org/ChiPass/ChiPass
Also, this is the opposite of what you asked for, but many entries have alternatives.
codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware
open-slopware
Codeberg.orgCat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch)
in reply to Taggart • • •@mttaggart Yes, and I really appreciate all the work @whitequark put into this!
There is no dedicated ChiPass fediverse account, but it would gladly be on my list if it was.
Taggart
in reply to Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) • • •