I should make a list of FOSS apps, projects, and services that have Fediverse accounts and don't code with AI, then strike them from the list with a big ELIMINATED notice if they do start drinking the slop kool-aid.

EDIT: Made one fedidevs.com/s/MTA2OA/

Esta entrada fue editada (hoy, 5:27)
in reply to Cat ๐Ÿˆ๐Ÿฅ— (D.Burch)

add me, please. i'm a FOSS AI-free game console :)

Home page: fireflyzero.com/
Source code: github.com/firefly-zero
AI policy: docs.fireflyzero.com/internal/ai/

in reply to Freeeeeeeeeeeeee

@freeplay@catsalad

No, our point isn't to shame projects that use AI, and rather to highlight those which don't.

See starlightnet.work/posts/the-no-ai-list.html which goes over why I started the list and what the approach/philosophy behind it is

in reply to Alexia

@freeplay@catsalad
Historically, the projects that got removed from the list fell into one of two categories

- Projects which's ban depended purely on licensing or was a temporary measure (maybe QEMU or OpenJDK in the future)
- Projects which had a policy discussion wherein people which use AI pushed for a more lenient policy (think bevy)

other cases are rare, moreso exceptions than the norm

in reply to viq

@viq@freeplay@catsalad

RE: borgmatic
don't think so! this still clearly says Please do not use AI agents to modify this codebase.
Weirdly enough it then...still lists out interesting parts of the codebase?? but I think I can write that off as an oddity more than anything

RE: readeck

sure why not :)
if ya can show me where their policy is ofc

in reply to Cat ๐Ÿˆ๐Ÿฅ— (D.Burch)

Just found this: Fork of KPXC without LLM commits: codeberg.org/ChiPass/ChiPass

Also, this is the opposite of what you asked for, but many entries have alternatives.

codeberg.org/ethical-foss/open-slopware