Counter-Therapism Rule


The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

::: spoiler Alt Text
A thread of the posts by @cait.bsky.social. They read as follows:

I had my first talk therapy session with my new therapist and she hit me with the "you're very self-aware" ☹️

not the "pleasure to have in class" of therapy

that's right, I know all the tools and have developed countertools so they no longer work. welcome to thunderdome
:::
Link to post

in reply to JayDee
I'd argue self-appreciation and self-deprication can both get in the way of self-awareness. Someone experiencing clinically significant grandiosity is likely lacking in self awareness just as someone experiencing clinically significant negative self talk (i.e., cognitive distortion) is likely lacking in self awareness
Esta entrada fue editada (ayer, 21:55)
in reply to TʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾

This seems to come down to a difference in definition. You are viewing self-awareness as only able to be positive, and having an implied lack of bias.

I don't expect either of those, I just view it as someone thinking about how they think or act, regardless of whether bias exists in that process. It's all self-awareness.

Esta entrada fue editada (ayer, 22:52)
in reply to JayDee
You are viewing self-awareness as only able to be positive and having an implied lack of bias.


I am not at all viewing it as only able to be positive; it should be accurate. Why call it awareness if it's not reflecting reality?

I just view it as someone thinking about how they think or act, regardless of whether bias exists in that process. It's all self-awareness.


That's not self awareness, that's meta cognition

in reply to TʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾

Metacognition is a sub-portion of self-awareness that does not look at behavior. They're intrinsically tied to one another, but self-awareness is broader than metacognition.

I'm not saying either of our definitions are incorrect - 'self-awareness' changes meaning somewhat depending on whether it's being used philosophically, psychoanalitically, etc. And the fact it's now used by the general public its meaning naturally shifts. I am saying your definition is more exclusionary, though, treating it more as a virtue to strive for rather than just an action one takes.

Functionally, if the only self-awareness is accurate self-awareness, then it can only be an advantage, and thus positive.

I would also argue that awareness does not need to be reflective of reality - you can be aware of hallucinations you are experiencing, or you can be aware that you are experiencing hallucinations. Both are awareness, but only one is more accurate to reality.

Esta entrada fue editada (hoy, 2:37)
in reply to JayDee
Esta entrada fue editada (hoy, 3:29)
in reply to TʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾

Alright I think we're about on the same page now. It's more how we are perceiving the compliment by the therapist.

Like, yes, self-awareness in itself is important for self-improvement, and some folks completely lack the habits of introspection and self-analysis, so at least having self-awareness is good. I would say that it's more a first step, though, a skill that can be leveraged for improvement.

I've previously had a similar conversation with one of my former therapists where he commented on my self-awareness, but did later talk to me about my anxiety and self-conciousness being from that self-awareness. Essentially, focusing on how I'm acting and thinking, and making too harsh of judgements on minor mistakes or inconsequential failings.

That's apart of why I don't view self-awareness as the state of being accurately dialed in about yourself yet, but instead just in the habit of noting your thoughts and behaviours, regardless of whether you've actually figured out your biases or not yet.

in reply to maria ~
Esta entrada fue editada (ayer, 21:42)
in reply to verdare
Esta entrada fue editada (ayer, 19:46)
in reply to verdare
Oh my god I literally just now got why my therapist kept saying that. I hate people do this and then expect me to get it. Especially therapists they should know better. If you try to sugarcoat it I won't get it almost guaranteed. Fucks sake what a waste of a time she was. Should have known something was up with how defensive about Israel she was...
in reply to Skunk [any]

I don't the only that's necessarily what your therapist was getting at.

I'm not defending her stance on Israel btw. Also her stance on Israel might imply religious beliefs and that's a whole other conversation.

However, I disagree with the commenter that said self-awareness is a good thing.

If you want to go through life empowering others, avoiding doing any harm of any kind, and leaving the world somehow better for your existence, then yes self awareness is a good thing.

However, if you want to be happy, satisfied, and go through life being comfortable and not require therapy, then self awareness is most definitely not a good thing.

That is to say, self awareness is highly correlated with anxiety and depression.

in reply to maria ~

As a psychotherapist, working with people who are self-aware is a pleasure. I wouldn't ever say that to someone if not meant as a genuine compliment.

Although I believe not many of our patients actually are as self aware as they think. I think we as humans often are good in introspection where it's easy and comfortable to do so, while glaring over pretty blatant cognitive errors in some other parts, and this is usually where problems arise and disorders develop. And interestingly some people seem to think of themselves as someone who's perfectly introspective but just for some external, unchangeable factor immune to any kind of positive change. Maybe they could feel irritated about the compliment, because in their minds it reinfoces their idea of being helpless against their problems (in the sense of: I already know everything, it's just not possible to change anything or I would've already done that)? I could imagine that's how I would feel, but of course it's just a guess.

in reply to verdare
A series of circumstances have made me effectively resistant to CBT, and sadly not the kick-based one. "Talk to yourself as you would to a friend", they say to the dude who has never had any and therefore has no idea of what does that even mean
Esta entrada fue editada (ayer, 18:16)

196 reshared this.

in reply to SlurpingPus

The point is to be kind to yourself. You should be honest with your friends, but you should make efforts to frame that honesty in a caring and positive light, ensuring them that they're safe with you and that you're raising your concerns out of love for them.

The therapist's point is that most people know to treat they're friends that way, but tend to be much harsher and less generous with themselves. So: cut yourself some slack, is the message.

in reply to Carlos Solís

How you would treat a child, how your childhood self should have been treated not how you were treated as a kid. If a kid came up to you with your problems what would you say?

Take the criticism for example. Would you not tell the kid some along the lines of "that sucks, bud. Its not really your fault. I've been there and made it through, you can too."

in reply to phdepressed
I don't know, wasn't "tough love" supposed to be necessary to prevent kids from growing up too pampered and entitled? At least that's how I used to be treated back in the day, as if any assistance would make me incapable or unwilling to sustain myself (not like that made any difference, I was still unable to pull my own bootstraps and am therefore well behind my peers)

196 reshared this.