What problem does sharing media contribute to, exactly? How many artists are starving because a fan downloaded their discography, vs the sheer amount of money owed to artists in unpaid royalties and "creative accounting"?
What problem does sharing media contribute to, exactly? How many artists are starving because a fan downloaded their discography, vs the sheer amount of money owed to artists in unpaid royalties and "creative accounting"?
And this is happening to stars; it's got to be worse for smaller artists.
Artists make money from their fans. Fans discover artists through media sharing. If nobody shared media, I wouldn't have discovered my favourite bands and spent hundreds of dollars on tickets over the course of my life, or my favourite authors whose books I have bought as gifts many times over, or when I was younger my favourite kinds of games, that I would go on to spend tens of thousands of dollars on over the course of my life (and not just on Steam!).
From where I'm sitting, it sure does seem like it contributes - but not to problems.
Media conglomerates insist that if people can't afford their prices, then they should go without their product. I'm doing exactly that to show a point - namely, that they're not as necessary for a good living as they think they are.
I have never subscribed any of these streaming services. The pressure from friends was intense but at the end of the day I simply felt no need and even less appeal to it.
Nowadays, I hear those same friends how expensive it has become to keep all of these services to follow their interests and how the catalogue has been degrading.
I have the blessing and the curse of never having had the chance of having a social life. No peer pressure in exchange for no support network. Not quite the fair deal, but I must do with what I have.
In a sense I do think this kind of approach matters more than people give it credit for. Most people tend to see piracy as a way to consume media without supporting the rightsholders of that media, but even pirated consumption is still support.
A person who is, say, pirating Harry Potter books and other media is still giving Rowling and her franchise and ideas space in their head, maybe contributing to further conversations about her, and overall inadvertently promoting her whether they like it or not - as opposed to having used that time and energy to consume media from someone more worth the time and effort, like say, Ursula Le Guin.
For example I was watching a video from a YouTuber who does controller reviews. In that video he briefly mentioned two controllers that were of such poor quality that they were literally unusable. He went on to say that he would not be making videos about them, because he found that even when he goes out of his way to give a controller the worst review possible, tons of people still buy them.
Personally, I think that i
... Mostrar más
In a sense I do think this kind of approach matters more than people give it credit for. Most people tend to see piracy as a way to consume media without supporting the rightsholders of that media, but even pirated consumption is still support.
A person who is, say, pirating Harry Potter books and other media is still giving Rowling and her franchise and ideas space in their head, maybe contributing to further conversations about her, and overall inadvertently promoting her whether they like it or not - as opposed to having used that time and energy to consume media from someone more worth the time and effort, like say, Ursula Le Guin.
For example I was watching a video from a YouTuber who does controller reviews. In that video he briefly mentioned two controllers that were of such poor quality that they were literally unusable. He went on to say that he would not be making videos about them, because he found that even when he goes out of his way to give a controller the worst review possible, tons of people still buy them.
Personally, I think that information freedom matters enough that anything published under licenses that are more restrictive than copyleft, permissive ones, or straight public domain is unethical. If private property is theft, and it is, that absolutely extends into knowledge and culture as well. If I were a purist about that, I would go out of my way to use things like the fully free Linux distros, and only consume media under those aforementioned licenses. Truth be told I don't though, I do pirate corporate media sometimes. But I do try to give space where it counts too - trying to use some time and energy to seek out any kind of media that's more open.
That is indeed my philosophy - "even pirated consumption is still support" in the form of giving a platform, publicity, or space in your brain. Even further so considering the many, many problematic artists out there, and the many other artists that have collaborated with them, making entire genres nearly unconscionable as a result.
If there's nothing to watch then don't subscribe to four different services. Streaming gives you more say in which channels/services you get than cable does.
I frequently listen to my coworkers/mutuals list how many streaming services they have and how much they cost a month, leaving the proper maths to only to the listeners because they won't hear the real bill.. I had to quit one that cost "only" 19€ per month because I wasn't able to afford it anymore!
i cant imagine paying for 5+streaming which would easly be 100+, plus most of the shows/movies, they allocate all the resources to that one show but neglecting another.
Yeah, same. Everything is like 20-25 per month if not more, it just doesn't make sense. Or 10-15 WITH ADS? Why would I pay for watching ads? But they say they have to have all the +5 services, because they watch one, spouse the other and the kids want these..
Literal NPCs lol. How can people be this financially illiterate? It's like NOT consuming sth is an idea that never crosses their minds. Like they need to have everything, even if they don't need it.
These are the same people that also spend 10k annually on drive through coffee, work cafeteria lunches and second coffee, then takeout for dinner; while also complaining how expensive everything is and how poor they are. The word "budget" isn't in their dictionary
Its fine if you know what you are doing. But because anyone can set up a pirate bay mirror at this point, it can be a bit iffy to download stuff from there. I'm in a happy position of being able to use a excellent private tracker, but about once a year I do get something from pirate bay because I cant find it elsewhere. I do feel a bit icky after, but so far, all has been fine. knocks all the wood I can find
Carlos Solís
in reply to oldmanalex • •reshared this
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ y IAmLamp reshared this.
W98BSoD
in reply to Carlos Solís • • •CmdrShepard49
in reply to Carlos Solís • • •like this
Davel23 likes this.
frongt
in reply to CmdrShepard49 • • •like this
Davel23 y onewithoutaname like this.
Carlos Solís
in reply to frongt • •like this
IAmLamp likes this.
reshared this
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ y IAmLamp reshared this.
unfortunate_ferret
in reply to Carlos Solís • • •What problem does sharing media contribute to, exactly? How many artists are starving because a fan downloaded their discography, vs the sheer amount of money owed to artists in unpaid royalties and "creative accounting"?
- rollingstone.com/music/music-news/james-taylor-sues-warner-brothers-over-royalties-185798/
- forbes.com/sites/carlieporterfield/2020/05/09/how-little-richard-was-exploited-by-a-bad-record-deal-…
- vice.com/en/article/little-richard-made-millions-it-all-went-to-his-label/
... Mostrar másWhat problem does sharing media contribute to, exactly? How many artists are starving because a fan downloaded their discography, vs the sheer amount of money owed to artists in unpaid royalties and "creative accounting"?
And this is happening to stars; it's got to be worse for smaller artists.
Artists make money from their fans. Fans discover artists through media sharing. If nobody shared media, I wouldn't have discovered my favourite bands and spent hundreds of dollars on tickets over the course of my life, or my favourite authors whose books I have bought as gifts many times over, or when I was younger my favourite kinds of games, that I would go on to spend tens of thousands of dollars on over the course of my life (and not just on Steam!).
From where I'm sitting, it sure does seem like it contributes - but not to problems.
Black Artists Are Still Getting Ripped Off the Way Little Richard Was
Drew Schwartz (VICE)Carlos Solís
in reply to unfortunate_ferret • •Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ reshared this.
qyron
in reply to Carlos Solís • • •And that is valid.
I have never subscribed any of these streaming services. The pressure from friends was intense but at the end of the day I simply felt no need and even less appeal to it.
Nowadays, I hear those same friends how expensive it has become to keep all of these services to follow their interests and how the catalogue has been degrading.
I sincerely do not care.
like this
Carlos Solís likes this.
Carlos Solís
in reply to qyron • •like this
onewithoutaname likes this.
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ reshared this.
AnimalsDream
in reply to Carlos Solís • • •In a sense I do think this kind of approach matters more than people give it credit for. Most people tend to see piracy as a way to consume media without supporting the rightsholders of that media, but even pirated consumption is still support.
A person who is, say, pirating Harry Potter books and other media is still giving Rowling and her franchise and ideas space in their head, maybe contributing to further conversations about her, and overall inadvertently promoting her whether they like it or not - as opposed to having used that time and energy to consume media from someone more worth the time and effort, like say, Ursula Le Guin.
For example I was watching a video from a YouTuber who does controller reviews. In that video he briefly mentioned two controllers that were of such poor quality that they were literally unusable. He went on to say that he would not be making videos about them, because he found that even when he goes out of his way to give a controller the worst review possible, tons of people still buy them.
Personally, I think that i
... Mostrar másIn a sense I do think this kind of approach matters more than people give it credit for. Most people tend to see piracy as a way to consume media without supporting the rightsholders of that media, but even pirated consumption is still support.
A person who is, say, pirating Harry Potter books and other media is still giving Rowling and her franchise and ideas space in their head, maybe contributing to further conversations about her, and overall inadvertently promoting her whether they like it or not - as opposed to having used that time and energy to consume media from someone more worth the time and effort, like say, Ursula Le Guin.
For example I was watching a video from a YouTuber who does controller reviews. In that video he briefly mentioned two controllers that were of such poor quality that they were literally unusable. He went on to say that he would not be making videos about them, because he found that even when he goes out of his way to give a controller the worst review possible, tons of people still buy them.
Personally, I think that information freedom matters enough that anything published under licenses that are more restrictive than copyleft, permissive ones, or straight public domain is unethical. If private property is theft, and it is, that absolutely extends into knowledge and culture as well. If I were a purist about that, I would go out of my way to use things like the fully free Linux distros, and only consume media under those aforementioned licenses. Truth be told I don't though, I do pirate corporate media sometimes. But I do try to give space where it counts too - trying to use some time and energy to seek out any kind of media that's more open.
Tl;dr: play Battle for Wesnoth.
The Battle for Wesnoth
www.wesnoth.orgCarlos Solís likes this.
reshared this
Carlos Solís reshared this.
Carlos Solís
in reply to AnimalsDream • •Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ reshared this.
ryper
in reply to oldmanalex • • •like this
Get_Off_My_WLAN likes this.
14th_cylon
in reply to ryper • • •teelin134
in reply to oldmanalex • • •like this
fistac0rpse likes this.
ShutUpWesley
in reply to teelin134 • • •cmnybo
in reply to teelin134 • • •like this
onewithoutaname likes this.
RogueBanana
in reply to cmnybo • • •HellieSkellie
in reply to teelin134 • • •WeirdGoesPro
in reply to oldmanalex • • •DominusOfMegadeus
in reply to oldmanalex • • •Lantsu
in reply to DominusOfMegadeus • • •like this
AGuyAcrossTheInternet likes this.
Tollana1234567
in reply to Lantsu • • •Lantsu
in reply to Tollana1234567 • • •blackberry28
in reply to Lantsu • • •
in reply to Lantsu • • •Tollana1234567
in reply to oldmanalex • • •LemmyEntertainYou
in reply to oldmanalex • • •rottenmummy
in reply to LemmyEntertainYou • • •Are there other alternatives now?
RogueBanana
in reply to rottenmummy • • •I would recommend 1337 instead. Has pretty much every category like TPB.
But if you are interested in self hosting, check our Arr stack for full automation and jellyfin as media center.
rottenmummy
in reply to RogueBanana • • •Herbal Gamer
in reply to LemmyEntertainYou • • •Uri
in reply to Herbal Gamer • • •HuudaHarkiten
in reply to Herbal Gamer • • •lobut
in reply to Herbal Gamer • • •Herbal Gamer
in reply to lobut • • •/home/pineapplelover
in reply to lobut • • •lobut
in reply to /home/pineapplelover • • •glibg10b
in reply to lobut • • •Censed
in reply to LemmyEntertainYou • • •Matt
in reply to oldmanalex • • •quediuspayu
in reply to oldmanalex • • •Every time I recommend a show and they ask me where they can watch it.
Fuck if I know.
Censed
in reply to quediuspayu • • •blunderworld
in reply to oldmanalex • • •What's the expert opinion on using Stremio with the extra add-ons for streaming? Seems a little too easy and convenient to be true.
I can't help but wonder what they get out of it, and how safe it is. Am I overthinking it?