"I suggest the social action: shame. Shame these people. Their actions are shameful. AI bros hate being shamed and they try to make rules against shaming — because shame works.
None of these people doing shameful things deserve a place in polite company. They should be shamed for their shameful choices.
The AI industry is also running a PR push to redefine common word usage. The word “slop” is also super effective — so the bros really hate “slop” and try to define it to mean slop they don’t like.
But all AI output is slop. It’s social spam. That’s what it’s for. It’s slop! Say “slop” every time."
pivot-to-ai.com/2026/10/14/linux-kernel-goes-full-ai-slop-code-hides-chatbot-commits/
Linux kernel goes full AI slop code, hides chatbot commits
Linux is the name of a computer operating system kernel and a group of systems built on it, like Ubuntu or Mint. Linux is the basic infrastructure of the Internet. It’s important. A report ju…Pivot to AI
reshared this
Hylke Bons 🥜
in reply to tante • • •though let’s apply it to institutions and powerful individuals first and foremost.
I don’t feel like shaming my local takeaway for their slop flyer. :p
tante
in reply to Hylke Bons 🥜 • • •Hylke Bons 🥜
in reply to tante • • •tmw 🌈
in reply to Hylke Bons 🥜 • • •Adrien Plazas
in reply to tmw 🌈 • • •Otte Homan :: fediologist
in reply to Hylke Bons 🥜 • • •Androcat
in reply to tante • • •Sensitive content
@hbons
In some cases it is a kindness to inform that the choice is not neutral.
Of course, some kindnesses are ill received.
Crystal
in reply to tante • • •Alright, I'm in agreement about casting shame on the guilty and choosing the words with traditional or dictionary meanings. Would you say we should keep the word slop for the new meaning and henceforth call the messy meat sandwiches Intelligent-Joes?
Bellegray Lane
in reply to tante • • •Es Reicht!
in reply to Hylke Bons 🥜 • • •Rule #1: Don't mess with people who handle your food.
No Fate: Butlerian Jihad Now
in reply to Es Reicht! • • •So don't let them handle your food. Simple.
George B
in reply to Hylke Bons 🥜 • • •@hbons
I very much view slop flyers for restaurants through a different lens based on the price of the food and how many locations they have.
The cheap take out on the corner: whatever, I might complain a bit if I think they'll listen but unless there is a comparable one without a slop flyer nearby I'm not actually changing anything
The local chain with 10 locations around the city: actively looking for alternatives
The global chain: probably already boycotting them for other reasons
lobo
in reply to Hylke Bons 🥜 • • •No Fate: Butlerian Jihad Now
in reply to lobo • • •@lobocode
So write them. Write why you won't visit their establishment any more.
chloe
in reply to Hylke Bons 🥜 • • •I shamed the local grocery store for using ai slop because the grocery store is in a town currently fighting 55+ proposed data center projects and they should've read the room for pitys sake
chloe
in reply to chloe • • •And no 55 isn't exaggerating this is in Archbald Pennsylvania and there are at least 76 data center proposals and 4 proposed full size gas plants and hundreds of diesel generators being pushed in my county. Just in my county. 55 in one town.
Pēteris Krišjānis
in reply to tante • • •mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6)
in reply to Pēteris Krišjānis • • •The Great Llama
in reply to mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6) • • •@peteriskrisjanis
Exactly. Fuck Linus and fuck slop. He's sabotaging everything he's built and I can't help but suspect he got paid to do it.
5ombr4
in reply to mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6) • • •Because not all vibecoded changes are slop. You can't call it slop just because it's made with IA. You can find a lot of slop code not made with IA at all.
It is slop when the code is not properly reviewed or tested.
jo the disgraced
in reply to tante • • •I've seen a push to redefine slop as "particularly bad LLM output", as opposed to LLM output in general.
"Our new AI tool eliminates slop" my brother in christ you _are_ the slop
Mattias Eriksson ⛵🎸🚵
in reply to jo the disgraced • • •There are many rational reasons to be anti-AI, trained on stolen data, driving climate change, techbros being assholes aso.
But saying: "- No matter how good code it produces, it is still slop!!!!" , that is just going to make you look quite irrational.
Carlos Solís likes this.
Cassandrich
in reply to Mattias Eriksson ⛵🎸🚵 • • •Cassandrich
in reply to Cassandrich • • •@snaggen @jo "No matter how good code it produces---"
No, stop right there. It does not *produce* code. It *re*produces it. And mixes it to obfuscate the source and launder copyright, the same way a crypto mixer launders money.
So what you are actually saying is:
"No matter how good the code I get to copyright-launder and reuse without attribution or following the licensing terms..."
And that is pretty damning.
goedelchen
in reply to Cassandrich • • •🌸 lumi-nhac 🌱
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Sensitive content
Mikel Forcada EA5IYL / N7EES
in reply to Cassandrich • • •J. R. DePriest :EA DATA. SF:
in reply to Mattias Eriksson ⛵🎸🚵 • • •@snaggen @jo
"Code generated by genAI is slop" is a tautology, that is the definition.
Regular developers just want to write code and use tools but there is a legit war over the future of the value of human life and labor and they are in the middle, whether they want to be or not.
The nuance of asking "yes, but what if it only does 'X'. Is that still slop?" is getting into the opposing ideologies. One reason to ask this is so someone can produce code while using genAI while still technically complying with whatever the "No AI" policy is. GenAI zealots will use this as a wedge to creep over the line, get buy-in that it's actually okay just this once, and then keep doing that until the "No AI" policy is meaningless.
The Epstein class, fossil fuel billionaires, and the effective altruist broligarchs have joined forces to deskill us, manipulate us, devalue our creativity, surveil us, and even murder us when it serves their ends. Generative AI is the largest, most effective tool they've ever had. Choosing to use genAI benefits them more than it benefits you.
Artemis
in reply to Mattias Eriksson ⛵🎸🚵 • • •@snaggen @jo Even if it is irrational, it’s not nearly as irrational as being convinced (and trying to convince everyone else) that the slop generator is somehow alive, has feelings and morals, and is likely to destroy humanity.
And yet, those people got to spend ONE TRILLION DOLLARS on their slop machines.
I’ll stop being irrational when they do. Or at least when they’ll stop bleeding us all.
Emil Thorsøe
in reply to Mattias Eriksson ⛵🎸🚵 • • •@snaggen @jo I would say more that there should be a separation, whether something works at technical level and whether it's a morally acceptable thing to do...in a perfect world...
That said, irrational expression could still be effective.
Somehow though I don't feel the shame even while accepting many of the moral tenets, so I'd guess not effective for people that don't.
I think based on the Debian vote, most people have accepted this is the new reality that may get toned down a bit after the economic bubble bursts. Obviously there are many communities that are anti-llm too, like codeberg, so I may be wrong here, though OS communities do immediately see the harm of slop submissions from people, who do not even try out, what they submit etc. so they'd expected to be more anti-llm than norm YMMV.
nicole
in reply to Mattias Eriksson ⛵🎸🚵 • • •flere-imsaho 🇺🇦
in reply to nicole • • •✨buff dog himbo✨
in reply to nicole • • •nicole
in reply to ✨buff dog himbo✨ • • •✨buff dog himbo✨
in reply to nicole • • •David Gerard
in reply to jo the disgraced • • •chloe
in reply to jo the disgraced • • •Jeroen
in reply to jo the disgraced • • •chloe
in reply to Jeroen • • •lol 😂😆😂
Emil Thorsøe
in reply to jo the disgraced • • •@jo I use slop to describe generated code that has not been reviewed at reasonable level and has not had other methods in use to validate code quality independently of the primary generation task, it has nothing to do with quality except as indirect consequence.
You probably count me as AI bro or whatever, while I do accept much of the criticism at some level.
Matthew Cowen
in reply to tante • • •This too (Meta interference), appears like an attempt by Meta to take over Infrastructure. They’ve already tried as an ISP, and they have bullied their way into fiber deployment across the world. If I’m reading this correctly, this is very worrisome.
"Linux is not a social warrior project, it’s a Meta project! When your networking fails, remember to say: Thank you Meta!”
diana 🏳️⚧️🦋🌱
in reply to tante • • •Beady Belle Fanchannel
in reply to tante • • •Cassandrich
in reply to Beady Belle Fanchannel • • •@Profpatsch I love Mastodon account notes. Clicked thru and was not disappointed by past-me:
Ghost of 4
in reply to Cassandrich • • •@dalias
Yup. I have a similar private note for that account.
I should probably follow through on my desire to call these accounts out on the Fediblock hashtag. Second strike == raise the alarm. Seems fair. I'm pretty good about checking the nature of their other posts before commiting to the initial block.
@Profpatsch@mastodon.xyz
Uwe Küchler
in reply to Cassandrich • • •TIL about account notes, thank you.
Just tagged two in this thread as "AI Bro".
Beady Belle Fanchannel
in reply to Cassandrich • • •flere-imsaho 🇺🇦
in reply to Beady Belle Fanchannel • • •Es Reicht!
in reply to tante • • •Toni Aittoniemi
in reply to tante • • •Michal Špondr
in reply to tante • • •This black-and-white rejection of generative AI is childish.
teledyn 𓂀
in reply to Michal Špondr • • •@michal
And quite another thing to torch your planet in the process while gleefully funding fascism.
@tante
FediThing
in reply to Michal Špondr • • •Microsoft exec called AI scraping ‘the largest theft of labor in human history,' new unredacted filings reveal | TechCrunch
Rebecca Bellan (TechCrunch)Michal Špondr
in reply to FediThing • • •FediThing
in reply to Michal Špondr • • •Michal Špondr
in reply to FediThing • • •Sunflorapunk
in reply to Michal Špondr • • •Michal Špondr
in reply to Sunflorapunk • • •Sunflorapunk
in reply to Michal Špondr • • •✨buff dog himbo✨
in reply to Michal Špondr • • •@michal@spondr.cz @xaq @FediThing @tante you people are fucking insufferable. I don't give a shit about your workflows or whatever research & development you're streamlining with your teeny tiny baby LLM who's never chugged way too much water & power bc he's just a little guy with little bitty training data sets. UwU
Fuck your LLMs at every scale. I don't care. You're a shill & my kids have no future on this planet you're making excuses for destroying with these stupid fucking technicalities. Shut up.
Chapter One
in reply to Michal Špondr • • •🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄)
in reply to Michal Špondr • • •@michal acceptable piracy steals from soulless corporations and gives to individuals; AI steals from individuals and gives to soulless corporations.
Also, genAI is an existential threat to so many communities¹, and any use of it is unethical (though there are *some* uses that are acceptable, IMO, such as as an accessibility aid).
¹ all of Fedi, for instance
@FediThing @tante
LisPi
in reply to Michal Špondr • • •@michal @FediThing Pay close attention to the words.
Labour is what was used. The point is not the product.
The commodification of art is also an atrocity, which has been pushed and perpetuated by copyright maximalists.
See the Golden Calf and its follow-up volumes if you're legitimately interested in learning about that topic.
watch
www.youtube.comjincy quones
in reply to Michal Špondr • • •@michal You wanna talk about fanaticism? Look up TESCREAL and how the people at the top of the slop pile are essentially doomsday cultists rushing to develop AGI to make humanity obsolete.
And no, AI helping people write code is not a good thing by default. You're the one thinking in black-and-white.
LisPi
in reply to Michal Špondr • • •@michal Nevermind the ethical problems or the fact the technology is fundamentally unreliable and cannot have its risk of introducing Trusting Trust issues & Hypocrite Commits removed, as well as the cognitive damage known to occur to its users regardless of how well they know how it works.
You would literally be better off binge-drinking. It comes with more warning signs.
flere-imsaho 🇺🇦
in reply to Michal Špondr • • •Michal Špondr
in reply to flere-imsaho 🇺🇦 • • •flere-imsaho 🇺🇦
in reply to Michal Špondr • • •maya
in reply to Michal Špondr • • •Jarno
in reply to Michal Špondr • • •mr_harm
in reply to tante • • •man there are layers to this shit onion for sure.
Don't like the meta involvement. Don't like the pay-to-play attitude for kernel contributions (although I agree that contributions should not be made easy. They shouldn't be made exclusionary as well. It should just depend on code quality). Don't like the overall tone this is worded ("social warrior project")
Unfortunately Linux is still the least bad alternative in terms of compatibility and support compared to windows and MacOS.
Carlos Solís likes this.
Carlos Solís
in reply to mr_harm • •like this
Alfine, just adrienne y David Gerard like this.
cynical melomaniac
in reply to tante • • •Chapter One
in reply to cynical melomaniac • • •Franceska Mann
in reply to tante • • •Oleksii
in reply to tante • • •[1 of 2] The wording is a bit too strong there, blaming wrong people for wrong things. Slop is a result of a developer ignoring the code output. It was there before LLMs, though people have to try harder even if they just copy-paste from StackOverflow without thinking.
Author assumed there are AI Overlords, while in reality it’s just a bunch of corrupted and greedy (and mostly crazy) technocrats.
Oleksii
in reply to Oleksii • • •an actual bus
in reply to Oleksii • • •Oleksii
in reply to an actual bus • • •an actual bus
in reply to Oleksii • • •David Gerard
in reply to Oleksii • • •Mister Dave
in reply to Oleksii • • •Oleksii
in reply to Mister Dave • • •@misterdave Nobody is doing anything bad. He used Claude to make something faster in Linux kernel. He’s not calling to do erhnical cleansing.
There are real villains like DHH, if you need one of software world.
Ghost of 4
in reply to Oleksii • • •@oleksify@mastodon.social
The cognitive dissonance of putting "vegan" in your profile and still thinking your AI apologia is welcome in an AI critical thread. May all your vegan advocacy threads be filled with carnivore reply guys, fuckface.
(no disrespect to vegetarians or vegans who understand the irony here; I keep my mouth shut in your threads)
@tante
Sharp Cheddar Goblin
in reply to tante • • •anonenity
in reply to Sharp Cheddar Goblin • • •...and from the sound of it, neither are you sloppin'
Sharp Cheddar Goblin
in reply to anonenity • • •gudenau
in reply to tante • • •an actual bus
in reply to gudenau • • •John Breen
in reply to tante • • •Maddad The Friendly Ghost 👻
in reply to tante • • •tkissing
in reply to tante • • •paelnever
in reply to tkissing • • •Sorry, why?
tkissing
in reply to paelnever • • •@paelnever
He was known for being toxic and verbally abusive on the kernel mailing list for a long time. He was "celebrated" in "men's rights" forums and on Breitbart for some of his public statements.
Yes, he got therapy and apologized, that's a first step. But he still has work to do and his statements about AI and the elitism in them don't raise much hope in me.
@tante
tkissing
in reply to tkissing • • •@paelnever
lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/6/495
"retroactively aborted" is not someone in his position, even in 2012, should write and it's way beyond "having a bad day".
Want some more? "Whoever wrote it should be shot." maybe? How about "Hardware designers are f*cking morons that should be given extensive education about birth control and how not to procreate."?
The topic of abortion was quite popular with him in the 2010s, but there was also plenty of "brain damage" and "retarded".
LKML: Linus Torvalds: Re: Regression - /proc/kmsg does not (always) block for 1-byte reads
lkml.orgpaelnever
in reply to tkissing • • •I would not call somebody "toxic" for having a dozen of bad days in more than 30 years. Must of the comments in the mailing list considered "toxic" are for simply defending the quality of the code inside the kernel, maybe with a little bit too much passion. I never saw a racist, xenophobic or sexist comment from him and if you have even a single example of it please show me.
Apologize is much more than a "first step", is one million light years away from 99% of the people is able to do.
As far as i know their statements about AI are something like "i don't care how you write the code you commit but you must understand the code, understand the kernel architecture and you are responsible for your commits".
About the "elitism" i don't know what are you talking about, please teach me.
ohir
in reply to tante • • •It would be good for all sane protein-based maintainers to stop commiting. LT is claiming that bots can. Let him vibe code with bots only. Do your tree to the drawer for a longer while. IDNK how fast it will be to get datacenters to crawl then crash due to the slop influx. Oh, it would be nice to see.
As for the LT 'infatuation'.
> the kernel project only wants serious developers. That includes having access to enough resources to function in this world.
AI pushers can pay more than a hundred of grands to take over a YT programmer tutorials channel. So yes, now came the times a maintainer of mid-popular FLOSS project you can sell out, buy a house, pay your kid's tuition. And embrace for the new brave world you helped 'them' to acquire.
Just personal 0.02 of any currency used.
David Gerard
in reply to ohir • • •derptron
in reply to tante • • •I guess it's not all that surprising that Linus would develop a preference for interacting with AI, nor that he'd just belittle and denigrate those who disagree with him.
As a C++ developer--and not just that, one that would drive him NUTS--I feel proud to have earned his abject hatred without him even knowing I exist. A smart man with some very silly notions he's quite unwilling to be skeptical of.
vOv
I have liked his system but honestly it's been pissing me off of late.
Tillman Reuter
in reply to tante • • •jesterchen42
in reply to tante • • •No Fate: Butlerian Jihad Now
in reply to jesterchen42 • • •@jesterchen
If you want to have your freedom spoiled by irresponsible traitors to FOSS, yes.
IMHO it's rather trowing out the baby with the bath water.
I wonder why people are always exaggerating the consequence (hey, why not totally refrain from using electricity, this was certainly where the problem originates), thus putting everybody of from doing the right thing, because this was just pivoted into extremism.
I worked pretty well with my computer 2010 without LLM.
cauZation
in reply to tante • • •Meanwhile, their primary cause of cornering energy markets, is increasingly successful, because of these obviously effective distractions.
The 99% suffer even more.
Luisf
in reply to tante • • •Bellegray Lane
in reply to tante • • •No Fate: Butlerian Jihad Now
in reply to Bellegray Lane • • •I am really really sad about that. But, yes.
King of Project Feature Creep
in reply to tante • • •jlapoutre
in reply to King of Project Feature Creep • • •Jeremy List
in reply to King of Project Feature Creep • • •King of Project Feature Creep
in reply to Jeremy List • • •@tante
Javensbukan
in reply to tante • • •NetBSD is committed to not using AI code - take that information with what you will.
Hopefully a more consumer friendly NetBSD based disto becomes a thing.
Keith
in reply to Javensbukan • • •Javensbukan
in reply to Keith • • •@keydelk It does indeed work! I used this handy script to install a GUI afterwards.
github.com/outpaddling/desktop-installer
GitHub - outpaddling/desktop-installer: Quickly configure a FreeBSD, NetBSD, or OpenBSD desktop system
GitHubJavensbukan
in reply to Keith • • •@keydelk I'm trying GhostBSD now which is feeling very similar to Debian/Ubuntu experience wise.
It's based on FreeBSD, which does allow AI tools for editing documentation and stuff, but not for code submits.
Better than Linux I suppose.
Javensbukan
in reply to Javensbukan • • •SOMETHING WONDERFUL HAS HAPPENED TO YOUR leah
in reply to Javensbukan • • •@Javensbukan people seem to be getting their arse in their hand about the precise wording of that commitment, rather than actually prepared to see how it's playing out in spirit...
or allow for the fact that in May 2024, before the AIpocalypse, the copyright implications were the only really visible ones and therefore the only ones worth making policy about - and doing so then was damn near prescient. i think we've all forgotten how quickly that changed.
VoidZeroOne
in reply to Javensbukan • • •what do you mean with "more consumer friendly"?
Javensbukan
in reply to VoidZeroOne • • •@TheOneDoc Like, any regular old consumer can install it and use it as a daily driver on a PC.
Ala Linux Mint or Ubuntu.
This already exists for FreeBSD, but not NetBSD to my knowledge.
14mission
in reply to tante • • •fr0g
in reply to tante • • •"Torvalds’s first publicly released chatbot code was in January this year, when he vibe-coded a project in Python because he didn’t know enough Python. The programming language kids learn in high school. The guy who runs the kernel couldn’t get his head around Python"
I hate when people write like this It's genuinely poisoning the discourse imo.
Asbestos
in reply to tante • • •Jenica Lake เหล็ถเลถ
in reply to tante • • •Arvin
in reply to tante • • •b3lt3r
in reply to tante • • •I looked at NetBSD and it scares me. I run s shit-ton of home stuff and some commercial products on Trixie and just don't see what a viable option is. Even if I went NetBSD (unlikely) - what about my Proxmox(es) and VPSs - it's fucked.
I guess from now on when asked, I'm running the Linux sloperating system.
Szymon Sokół 🇵🇱🇪🇺🇺🇦
in reply to tante • • •Linus Torvalds let Claude Code fix the Linux page cache. Then reviewers found a race.
Amanda Caswell (The New Stack)paelnever
in reply to tante • • •mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6)
in reply to paelnever • • •Greyshley
in reply to mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6) • • •paelnever
in reply to mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6) • • •Yes, precisely the people who convinced you that the kernel is being vibecoded now must have some dark objective because that's objectively false. Don't believe everything you hear, specially if what you hear is against free and copyleft software.
Knightmare
in reply to tante • • •bamfingle
in reply to tante • • •archives squirrel 🗃️🐿️
Unknown parent • • •GhostOnTheHalfShell
in reply to tante • • •Pumpkin Sponge
in reply to tante • • •kingmoth
in reply to tante • • •Zło To 🏴☠️
in reply to tante • • •Fam
in reply to tante • • •rob los ricos
in reply to tante • • •dude - i get this everywhere i go.
a librarian was complaining about me being in the library i visit 3-4 times per week.
she said 'and he talks back to me,' as if i were a peasant and she were royalty.
i get that from security guards, too. and store employees. and workers in non-profits that provide services for homeless people.
there's been a lot of shit-talking about me (and my mother) at the center for positive aging, because i was using drugs there. on a day i wasn't there!
No Fate: Butlerian Jihad Now
in reply to tante • • •nihilistic_capybara
in reply to tante • • •honestly I am very much a llm fanboy and I use llms every day but I must say operating systems are a step too far.
Is anyone forking the Linux kernel?
Otte Homan :: fediologist
in reply to tante • • •shaming is good. I'm sure you saw how Abdul ElSayed shamed Tommy "I'm a Christian!" In Michigan. Managed to get Tommy's tail between his legs in under 5 minutes. What a dick, Tommy. eupolicy.social/@jmaris/117461810385145539
(Tommy's been outed as a former staffer of Josh Hawley, not necessarily something to be proud of). The Onion will have a field day with Tommy.
Jordan Maris 🇪🇺 🇺🇦 #NAFO
2026-10-18 12:03:07
Davide_Sandini
in reply to tante • • •