This month's Windows 11 update broke the Recycle Bin, OneDrive, and possibly your PC's stability
This month's Windows 11 update broke the Recycle Bin, OneDrive, and possibly your PC's stability
According to Microsoft, users who have installed the KB5095051 update might encounter a strange Recycle Bin bug that replaces the names of deleted files with internal Recycle...Kishalaya Kundu (TechSpot)
like this
Technology reshared this.
FauxLiving
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •like this
elgordino likes this.
Brkdncr
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Technology reshared this.
0ndead
in reply to Brkdncr • • •Technology reshared this.
DarkCloud
in reply to 0ndead • • •Ahh yes, Microsoft lying about how bad Microsoft are. \s
Technology reshared this.
Bazoogle
in reply to DarkCloud • • •Technology reshared this.
0ndead
in reply to DarkCloud • • •Zer0_F0x
in reply to Brkdncr • • •I manage 40 and we had 2 issues that got resolved by uninstalling a different update.
Uninstalling it inexplicably nuked that machine's print drivers and I had to reinstall those lol
Brkdncr
in reply to Zer0_F0x • • •MS universal print.
How did you uninstall a different update? They’re cumulative.
Raptor_007
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
Technology reshared this.
aim4harmony
in reply to Raptor_007 • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
Technology reshared this.
pinball_wizard
in reply to Raptor_007 • • •DarkCloud
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •like this
Maeve y giantpaper like this.
Technology reshared this.
the_riviera_kid
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Technology reshared this.
Carlos Solís
in reply to effzehkoelle • •Technology reshared this.
Passerby6497
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Technology reshared this.
MIDItheKID
in reply to Passerby6497 • • •Project K2, baby!
/s if it wasn't obvious.
Technology reshared this.
MrSoup
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Technology reshared this.
Davel23
in reply to MrSoup • • •Technology reshared this.
Midnight Wolf
in reply to Davel23 • • •like this
Davel23 likes this.
Damage
in reply to MrSoup • • •Technology reshared this.
Midnight Wolf
in reply to Damage • • •Technology reshared this.
0ndead
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •like this
FaceDeer likes this.
Technology reshared this.
Passerby6497
in reply to 0ndead • • •Damage
in reply to 0ndead • • •like this
Maeve likes this.
13igTyme
in reply to 0ndead • • •kinther
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Technology reshared this.
Professorozone
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Technology reshared this.
GreenKnight23
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Technology reshared this.
PangurBan
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Technology reshared this.
Mulligrubs
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Technology reshared this.
smeenz
in reply to Mulligrubs • • •pinball_wizard
in reply to Mulligrubs • • •Yes. It's so weird.
Laying off all their competent engineers and then measuring performance on lines of code vibed.
Is it an incompetent evil plan, or an evil incompetent plan?
404found
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •like this
Lippy likes this.
Technology reshared this.
locahosr443
in reply to 404found • • •Technology reshared this.
ozymandias117
in reply to 404found • • •Somewhere around the end of Windows 8, they fired all of their testers
Now they're using AI to make patches
It's been a steady decline, not a fast decline
like this
Lippy likes this.
Technology reshared this.
Bazoogle
in reply to 404found • • •Technology reshared this.
404found
in reply to Bazoogle • • •GenosseFlosse
in reply to 404found • • •MonkderVierte
in reply to 404found • • •
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •is there any anecdotal evidence that IT departments are at least considering, thinking about, having an initial assessment of doing anything but just buying whatever slop microsoft is spewing out?
kinda feels like until the river of gold from enterprise sales slows there is no downside to microsoft burning their platform.
my anecdote is that no, IT is still a MS crack addict.
like this
Lippy likes this.
Technology reshared this.
Horsey
in reply to • • •Technology reshared this.
Bazoogle
in reply to Horsey • • •Technology reshared this.
bryndos
in reply to Bazoogle • • •Most people - especially those without critical thinking - are clicking buttons in browser based CRM systems. Or using some other web-gui hold their hand and query or transact with a database. OS makes no difference to them.
Even my very slow public sector org has moved most of its database interfaces to web apps by now - though i think there re still two important native windows (probably DOS) applications.
Apart from those something like Chrome OS or OSX would probably be best for them - they just need a stable, up to date web browser.
with cloud storage, and even MS pushing people to web apps, even paper pushers working via documents can still just use browser for stuff, and many are.
Lots of people i work with suck so badly at MS Word that they don't even know how shitty the web version is. They literally just click stuff and if the OS opens a web interface, then that's what they use.
Most of these people use androids or i phones for lots of things, so they certainly are capable of using things that are not windows - they just learn what buttons they
... Mostrar másMost people - especially those without critical thinking - are clicking buttons in browser based CRM systems. Or using some other web-gui hold their hand and query or transact with a database. OS makes no difference to them.
Even my very slow public sector org has moved most of its database interfaces to web apps by now - though i think there re still two important native windows (probably DOS) applications.
Apart from those something like Chrome OS or OSX would probably be best for them - they just need a stable, up to date web browser.
with cloud storage, and even MS pushing people to web apps, even paper pushers working via documents can still just use browser for stuff, and many are.
Lots of people i work with suck so badly at MS Word that they don't even know how shitty the web version is. They literally just click stuff and if the OS opens a web interface, then that's what they use.
Most of these people use androids or i phones for lots of things, so they certainly are capable of using things that are not windows - they just learn what buttons they need to click to do what. Like they would've in the 70s/80s with a unix terminal. Or in the 30s if they were operating a telephone switchboard.
Regrettable_incident
in reply to Horsey • • •Regrettable_incident
in reply to • • •Technology reshared this.
emergencyfood
in reply to Regrettable_incident • • •Including Play Store?
Technology reshared this.
Regrettable_incident
in reply to emergencyfood • • •Not entirely. It's an android so it does have the play store, but only about a dozen apps are allowed to be installed. I can't even install what 3 words, which my work uses constantly. Also I'd like to install the Google swipe keyboard, cos the Microsoft one is shit.
Basically, the combination of a device that's locked down hard and it only allowing MS products makes my work slower and harder than it needs to be.
Technology reshared this.
frongt
in reply to emergencyfood • • •emergencyfood
in reply to frongt • • •Redditisbollocks
in reply to • • •People can barely use Windows and it's been around for 30 years.
I am not teaching 180+ staff how to use Macs or Linux.
I'm not an MS fanboy by any means, but my job is hard enough without adding extra shit sprinkles on top.
Fuck that.
You obviously have zero knowledge about working in that environment.
Technology reshared this.
x00z
in reply to Redditisbollocks • • •It's not like they know how to use Windows either.
like this
bryndos likes this.
Technology reshared this.
bryndos
in reply to x00z • • •Yeah , most of the people in our IT don't know how to use windows, much less teach anyone else about it.
They just try, and often fail to lock it down so that people can't break it. They remote in and make something slightly less bad and say, "well that was all setup wrong". but they never teach anyone a thing - or apparently learn how to use install all this ms shite they buy before they force it on us.
I think that's the real issue with linux. IT people don't want to learn it, and learn how to secure it - because many of them - especially the mamagers have got imposter syndrome about windows or something or stockholm syndrome, i dunno..
At least when they fuck it up with miscsoft they can often blame MS - and often they've got a reasonable case ans MS does seem to keep fucking them over with updates.
in reply to Redditisbollocks • • •GenosseFlosse
in reply to • • •like this
Lippy likes this.
mlg
in reply to • • •It's because they sell all of their products as a vendor package with advertised SLAs and "discounts".
If your company needs cloud stuff and you happen to want Azure, you're basically getting locked into Teams.
Unlike specialty software like Adobe, pretty much everything Microsoft offers has feature parity or superior alternatives, it just relies on the fact that businesses aren't stuck on any one of their products.
There are actually a handful of companies that only use MacOS or Linux, but it requires both your IT team and management to be competent enough to throw MSFT away, which is much harder to do in a legacy settings when your entire domain infara is a 20+ year old AD domain.
GoatSynagogue
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Technology reshared this.
mycodesucks
in reply to GoatSynagogue • • •It isn't the details or severity of the break that matters.
It's that the quality control process is SUPPOSED to catch that, and whatever sorry excuse for a process they're using now ALLOWED a break that was obvious, visible, and repeatable, inside a critical, core function of the operating system, to make it to the end users, something that should trigger as an immediate, flashing warning light. That means the entire quality control process at the very least is SEVERELY compromised and unreliable, and there could very easily be MUCH more severe vulnerabilities and bugs hiding underneath that AREN'T immediately visible. To anyone who has done any professional development for non-disposable code bases, this isn't a whisper of a problem - it's an air horn.
Technology reshared this.
GoatSynagogue
in reply to mycodesucks • • •Developer written unit tests likely wouldn’t even catch that bug with the recycling bin, because it doesn’t even matter what the text says when it’s being deleted. It’s not a breaking bug. It wouldn’t hold up a release. It might have even been found in QA and might have a super low priority ticket to fix it because again, it’s non breaking and doesn’t affect anything in any way.
You don’t understand how software dev QA works, clearly.
Technology reshared this.
mycodesucks
in reply to GoatSynagogue • • •Yeah. I've only been a veteran of the process for 20 years - I don't know a thing about what I'm talking about.
"non-breaking" is a meaningless distinction. What you're REFERRING to is a "cosmetic" bug, and "cosmetic", depending on the software and the shop, does NOT mean "acceptable for release", and FURTHERMORE, this is not a new bug that's been filed as low priority or will-not-fix, but a REGRESSION because it DID work in the past, which means it's DOUBLE damning.
I'm not interested in waving around credentials about who knows more about software development - if you work in a shop that doesn't care about quality, that's between you and the shop. But if you want to claim that someone at Microsoft said "Yeah, it doesn't correctly reflect the filename, a critical check to ensure users don't accidentally delete the wrong file, which is something that's worked for 30 years" and then signed off on that, instead of the MUCH more likely explanation that NOBODY is looking at ANY of this crap with the detail they should be, I'm afraid I'm going to have to laugh.
To giv
... Mostrar másYeah. I've only been a veteran of the process for 20 years - I don't know a thing about what I'm talking about.
"non-breaking" is a meaningless distinction. What you're REFERRING to is a "cosmetic" bug, and "cosmetic", depending on the software and the shop, does NOT mean "acceptable for release", and FURTHERMORE, this is not a new bug that's been filed as low priority or will-not-fix, but a REGRESSION because it DID work in the past, which means it's DOUBLE damning.
I'm not interested in waving around credentials about who knows more about software development - if you work in a shop that doesn't care about quality, that's between you and the shop. But if you want to claim that someone at Microsoft said "Yeah, it doesn't correctly reflect the filename, a critical check to ensure users don't accidentally delete the wrong file, which is something that's worked for 30 years" and then signed off on that, instead of the MUCH more likely explanation that NOBODY is looking at ANY of this crap with the detail they should be, I'm afraid I'm going to have to laugh.
To give you an idea, in the XBox division, a division of Microsoft, this would be considered a compliance failure that prevents a game from going gold for launch on the platform, and if caught would cost the developer thousands and weeks to fix before the game could go live because it would necessitate starting the final step of the certification process over again, because EVERY SINGLE TEST has to be run again to ensure JUST this kind of regression doesn't resurface.
But no - the same company would claim it's totally acceptable for the operating system that runs bank software because it's "non-breaking".
Technology reshared this.
GoatSynagogue
in reply to mycodesucks • • •Technology reshared this.
bless
in reply to GoatSynagogue • • •zebidiah
in reply to mycodesucks • • •prole
in reply to GoatSynagogue • • •Technology reshared this.
GoatSynagogue
in reply to prole • • •What exactly is “broken” about the recycling bin because of this?
Does the recycling bin still work?
Does the right file get deleted?
You’ve got a strange definition of broken.
Technology reshared this.
tomalley8342
in reply to GoatSynagogue • • •Technology reshared this.
GoatSynagogue
in reply to tomalley8342 • • •tomalley8342
in reply to GoatSynagogue • • •prole
in reply to GoatSynagogue • • •I literally do not know because the dialog box might be wrong
Technology reshared this.
GoatSynagogue
in reply to prole • • •Technology reshared this.
cley_faye
in reply to GoatSynagogue • • •Technology reshared this.
GoatSynagogue
in reply to cley_faye • • •Technology reshared this.
Texas_Hangover
in reply to GoatSynagogue • • •Technology reshared this.
Jyek
in reply to Texas_Hangover • • •Technology reshared this.
mycodesucks
in reply to Jyek • • •Technology reshared this.
zebidiah
in reply to mycodesucks • • •Hundreds of dollars per license, and they still run ads in the os.....
Linux is zero dollars and shows zero ads...
like this
Lippy likes this.
ayyy
in reply to zebidiah • • •OccasionallyFeralya
in reply to ayyy • • •ayyy
in reply to OccasionallyFeralya • • •Jyek
in reply to mycodesucks • • •GoatSynagogue
in reply to Texas_Hangover • • •It’s not. Broken means it doesn’t work. Everything about deleting files works. The file you told it to delete gets deleted. The only “issue”, in the absolute least problematic use of the word, is that it displays an internal name rather than the regular file name of the file as it’s being deleted.
It’s not broken if it works exactly as it’s supposed to.
Technology reshared this.
1984
in reply to GoatSynagogue • • •
in reply to GoatSynagogue • • •So where is it pulling that data from?
What other file identifying functions are broken in a similar manner?
GoatSynagogue
• • •Read the article:
HotsauceHurricane
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Technology reshared this.
Bazoogle
in reply to HotsauceHurricane • • •Technology reshared this.
itsjustachairmary
in reply to Bazoogle • • •MIDItheKID
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Technology reshared this.
Bazoogle
in reply to MIDItheKID • • •Technology reshared this.
MIDItheKID
in reply to Bazoogle • • •Technology reshared this.
Lucelu2
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Technology reshared this.
Bazoogle
in reply to Lucelu2 • • •Run and RunOnce Registry Keys - Win32 apps
learn.microsoft.comTechnology reshared this.
MML
in reply to Lucelu2 • • •bobs_monkey
in reply to MML • • •OS2Warp
in reply to bobs_monkey • • •pirat
in reply to OS2Warp • • •𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
in reply to Lucelu2 • • •404found
in reply to Lucelu2 • • •MrKoyun
in reply to Lucelu2 • • •teft
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •So, microsoft, how's that vibe coding coming along?
Why do i ask? Oh, no reason.
like this
giantpaper likes this.
Technology reshared this.
Bazoogle
in reply to teft • • •Technology reshared this.
Rothe
in reply to Bazoogle • • •Technology reshared this.
Bazoogle
in reply to Rothe • • •Technology reshared this.
frongt
in reply to Bazoogle • • •Technology reshared this.
Bazoogle
in reply to frongt • • •Technology reshared this.
sompreno
in reply to Bazoogle • • •well yeah, humans make mistakes that ai is capable of finding but so does ai which also makes mistakes frequently.
companies that use ai for bug fixing are spending extra on ai only for the ai to create Spaghetti code and require humans to go back and fix it anyway.
Ai is good for quick code generation but when it comes to larger scale projects like creating an operating system its much better used as a tool to support devs rather then the other way round.
peetabix
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Passerby6497
in reply to peetabix • • •Technology reshared this.
FlashMobOfOne
in reply to peetabix • • •Nice.
My employer just switched away from Adobe, so thankfully, haven't see those issues.
Technology reshared this.
AbsolutelyClawless
in reply to peetabix • • •FlashMobOfOne
in reply to AbsolutelyClawless • • •Technology reshared this.
Pringles
in reply to AbsolutelyClawless • • •AbsolutelyClawless
in reply to Pringles • • •Prove_your_argument
in reply to peetabix • • •Almost certainly driver, sometimes a failing dock or cable though.
That's just adobe products. They're great for subscription revenue for adobe.
I switched to fedora for work myself and onlyoffice is handling my current pdf needs, works great and FOSS. Can save to DOCX and everything.. and the same program handles those too.
Technology reshared this.
Bazoogle
in reply to Prove_your_argument • • •Technology reshared this.
frongt
in reply to Bazoogle • • •TommySoda
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Technology reshared this.
Knightfox
in reply to TommySoda • • •Technology reshared this.
oppy1984
in reply to TommySoda • • •Smoogs
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Technology reshared this.
scripthook
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Technology reshared this.
bryndos
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •It's like that thing in Southpark "How do you kill that which has no life?"
Technology reshared this.
JcbAzPx
in reply to bryndos • • •Technology reshared this.
andros_rex
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •My work laptop has windows 11, and for some reason I keep losing my mouse pointer. I’ll boot it up and there will just be no cursor. I can reset my graphics driver (which is what googling suggests), enable and disable my mouse in the hardware manager, tweak all kinds of mouse settings - and nothing. Sometimes opening a pdf in the edge browser brings it back, but it can still disappear afterwords.
Also, pulling up the menu to print something can take several minutes. If I need to change printers on that menu, another several minutes. Sometimes, it’ll just crash the entire program I am trying to print from. It’ll also just ignore some settings occasionally - things like landscape versus portrait.
The search feature in explorer is also absolutely broken. You can type in the exact file name of something and it’ll find everything but that file. Even the “recent files” section is broken.
I don’t understand how anyone at Microsoft thinks Windows 11 is an acceptable product. Do they not use it?
... Mostrar másMy work laptop has windows 11, and for some reason I keep losing my mouse pointer. I’ll boot it up and there will just be no cursor. I can reset my graphics driver (which is what googling suggests), enable and disable my mouse in the hardware manager, tweak all kinds of mouse settings - and nothing. Sometimes opening a pdf in the edge browser brings it back, but it can still disappear afterwords.
Also, pulling up the menu to print something can take several minutes. If I need to change printers on that menu, another several minutes. Sometimes, it’ll just crash the entire program I am trying to print from. It’ll also just ignore some settings occasionally - things like landscape versus portrait.
The search feature in explorer is also absolutely broken. You can type in the exact file name of something and it’ll find everything but that file. Even the “recent files” section is broken.
I don’t understand how anyone at Microsoft thinks Windows 11 is an acceptable product. Do they not use it?
Technology reshared this.
khánh
in reply to andros_rex • • •mintiefresh
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •I dual boot Linux and Windows and it's really painful whenever I have to go into Windows. I try to avoid it at all costs.
It's so jarring to go into Windows.
Technology reshared this.
FlashMobOfOne
in reply to mintiefresh • • •Hello dual-boot brother.
Same.
Technology reshared this.
snugglesthefalse
in reply to FlashMobOfOne • • •Technology reshared this.
FlashMobOfOne
in reply to snugglesthefalse • • •Technology reshared this.
yeehaw
in reply to mintiefresh • • •k0e3
in reply to mintiefresh • • •gravitas_deficiency
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Technology reshared this.
frongt
Unknown parent • • •Technology reshared this.
Midnight Wolf
in reply to frongt • • •Snot Flickerman
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •#Linux Users:
Technology reshared this.
Reygle
in reply to Snot Flickerman • • •like this
FaceDeer likes this.
Technology reshared this.
XLE
in reply to Reygle • • •The Windows equivalent of this would basically be the discovery that a bunch of apps on the Microsoft Store were infected with malware.
This really sucks for people that migrated to Linux without becoming Linux experts, and chose a friendly distro based on Arch that came with the AUR, like the often-recommended CachyOS.
Reddit - Please wait for verification
AbbreviationsNo8803 (reddit)like this
Maeve likes this.
Technology reshared this.
Attacker94
in reply to XLE • • •There is a reason why the arch community had such a bad reputation when it came to newcomers, they were gate keeping good technical knowledge of the system. It had the side effect that most people became royal dicks on the forums and stopped being helpful, but it did have what I would consider the intended effect of people being wary of everything they did on their system.
I find the easy arch distros to be fairly interesting since my recommendation has always been that anyone who wants to daily drive an arch distro should install arch through command line at least once and read about the packages they use. I personally run endeavor os, but I started by doing the leg work, which led me to the conclusion that I prefer flatpaks over aur if it is available because they are far more easier to maintain good security practices on.
Technology reshared this.
Reygle
in reply to XLE • • •prole
in reply to Reygle • • •cmnybo
in reply to XLE • • •Technology reshared this.
XLE
in reply to cmnybo • • •Technology reshared this.
EpeeGnome
in reply to XLE • • •teft
in reply to XLE • • •You mean like this?
howtogeek.com/788382/beware-of-malware-in-windows-apps-on-the-microsoft-store/
Beware of Malware in Windows Apps on the Microsoft Store
Dave LeClair (How-To Geek)Snot Flickerman
in reply to Reygle • • •Which is honestly just as hilarious, because I use Ubuntu just trigger Arch nerds.
Couldn't happen to a nicer group of people.
Technology reshared this.
Reygle
in reply to Snot Flickerman • • •All the arch based distros are fine, only the AUR is affected, so unless someone goes out of their way to use the AUR they're golden.
Technology reshared this.
Snot Flickerman
in reply to Reygle • • •mushroommunk
in reply to Reygle • • •plutopos
in reply to mushroommunk • • •Septimaeus
in reply to mushroommunk • • •dream_weasel
in reply to Snot Flickerman • • •Neat.
prole
in reply to Snot Flickerman • • •Seems pretty unhealthy to be so weirdly angry at people who simply use a different Linux distro than you.
CosmoNova
in reply to Reygle • • •I think you vastly overestimate the importance of AUR. A lot of Arch users had to say something about the incident and many of them didn‘t even use it. It‘s definitely nothing essential.
Also Arch users still don‘t give a fuck about Windows. This whole AUR debacle has little to do with what OP was actually getting at.
Reygle
in reply to CosmoNova • • •Technology reshared this.
NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
in reply to Reygle • • •Technology reshared this.
Cethin
in reply to Reygle • • •FYI, CachyOS is Arch based. It has access to the AUR. If you weren't effected, that proves the point.
The AUR is a repository of last resort. It's useful, but you should be careful. That's true even before this even. It's a repository made by users, and is not verified.
lagoon8622
in reply to Reygle • • •Spice Hoarder
in reply to Reygle • • •Technology reshared this.
Reygle
in reply to Spice Hoarder • • •Technology reshared this.
ColeSloth
in reply to Spice Hoarder • • •Technology reshared this.
Reygle
in reply to ColeSloth • • •Technology reshared this.
RustyShackleford
in reply to Spice Hoarder • • •RobMyBot
in reply to Reygle • • •Technology reshared this.
Smoogs
in reply to RobMyBot • • •Technology reshared this.
Reygle
in reply to RobMyBot • • •Technology reshared this.
plutopos
in reply to Reygle • • •Technology reshared this.
Reygle
in reply to plutopos • • •Technology reshared this.
JcbAzPx
in reply to Reygle • • •Technology reshared this.
MrKoyun
in reply to Reygle • • •Not my linux 😎
I actually do use arch btw, however there really isnt anything to freak out over because I barely even use the aur and am just not updating from the aur for the time being. Its really not a big deal.
Technology reshared this.
lastweakness
in reply to Reygle • • •Creat
in reply to Reygle • • •snugglesthefalse
in reply to Reygle • • •dream_weasel
in reply to Reygle • • •Nobody is freaking out who isn't a moron.
There are a handful of arch users who eat crayons... if the windows users in 2026 leave any I mean.
imjustmsk
in reply to Reygle • • •never will install random packages without properly checking it, Got too carried away by "yay -Essing everything :sob:
bobs_monkey
in reply to Reygle • • •For those of us Arch btw users:
gist.github.com/Kidev/85756c3dcad3623ca5604a8135bafd14
Check if any infected package is installed using Arch authoritative list
Gistits_kim_love
in reply to Snot Flickerman • • •XLE
Unknown parent • • •The AUR is hosted on aur.archlinux.org/.
Just like how Microsoft hosts the Microsoft Store.
AUR (en) - Home
aur.archlinux.orglastweakness
Unknown parent • • •Technology reshared this.
Cethin
in reply to XLE • • •A_Random_Idiot
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Bwaz
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •/s
Technology reshared this.
Mihies
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •like this
FaceDeer likes this.
jordanlund
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Only thing I noticed was that it broke my onboard Blue Tooth. Mouse stopped working, no Blue Tooth On/Off switch or anything.
Hooked up a corded mouse, installed the latest drivers from Intel, problem solved!
potustheplant
in reply to jordanlund • • •Maeve
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •musket528
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •because i haven't used this goblinshit for months.
Padook
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •pinball_wizard
Unknown parent • • •That brings back memories of my own days dual booting. I am so very thankful for Valve's (and other's!) contributions to Proton for gaming on Linux.
NewNewAugustEast
Unknown parent • • •I have a laptop with dual boot just in case. Using two drives that are independent with Refined works really well.
Neither drive is aware of the other, and there is no worry whatever windows wants to do.
Hueristic_Autistic
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •9488fcea02a9
in reply to Hueristic_Autistic • • •Simulation6
in reply to 9488fcea02a9 • • •zebidiah
in reply to 9488fcea02a9 • • •Because it's boring....
And honestly, that's the best reason of all for why you should stay!
I got bored/curious and wanted something shiny and new, and I'm okay with occasional weirdness and things breaking,
I was on fedora for a while and now I'm on cachyOS with niri as the window manager.
The real question is not why would you leave, it's why would you go back to micro$oft....
hakunawazo
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •swiftywizard
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Snot Flickerman
Unknown parent • • •zebidiah
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •billwashere
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •Frenchgeek
in reply to billwashere • • •M137
in reply to effzehkoelle • • •