Is it just me, or are people becoming more prudish?


Pornography restrictions being codified into law, adult art being restricted from most Lemmy instances, Tarot readers blotting out the nudity on their cards on Reddit.

I'm watching the Magicians, on Amazon, and I use subtitles. All the curse words are purposefully filled in with random letters, so as not to offend the reader.

What's up with all the prudishness? Can people knock it off, please?

People have vaginas. And titties. And dicks. And asses. They swear. They drink. They fuck. Why is this generation afraid of that? Acknowledging these things isn't going to increase your chances of being sexually violated. So, what's the deal?

Esta entrada fue editada (hoy, 19:43)
in reply to tracyspcy
Jokes aside, while I don’t have any reliable data on this topic , so only my own perception , it is quite opposite from yours . On tv shows swearing are almost everywhere, due to some aggressive marketing watching porn and being only fans model is destigmatized , only fans models and female streamers have thousands of followers in social media almost the new rock stars .
Pornhub most popular search stats by countries etc is discussing routinely over internet each year .
Idk is it prudishness to you?
in reply to ki4jgt
adult art being restricted from most Lemmy instances


That one is probably a liability issue. Especially a problem with real-life porn, but even with drawn material, you'll often get characters which don't look like adults. So then the mods would have to review each post, which is too much work, and they'd also likely see shit they'd rather not.
Considering this platform is mostly volunteers, if not fully, it's just not worth it.

in reply to u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)

As an admin, spot on. People don't realize that as an admin I and liable for what goes on on my instance. Both financially and criminally. They can kick down my door for things posted, so of course I ban any NSFW, and I have still seen things I wish I could unsee that people have posted.

I always welcome others to spin up their own instance though. They are more than welcome to host it themselves, under their name.

in reply to Scrubbles
They can kick down my door for things posted, so of course I ban any NSFW


It's all part of the authoritarian backsliding the world is suffering right now. Big centralized services can shield themselves with laws like Section 230, while wielding the threat of prosecution like a cudgel against small operators that aren't "legitimate" in the way that big companies get treated and can't afford the effort it takes to guarantee compliance.

So instead, most would-be operators cave to the chilling effects and users are driven back into the thrall of the big tech propaganda and control platforms.

Asklemmy reshared this.

in reply to u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)

I wonder if it isn’t a reaction to the number of people blocking all NSFW content? Like if most of your users don't want to see porn in literally every other post and just block all NSFW as a quick workaround, then the headaches inherent in moderating adult content become much less worthwhile.

And without either blocking specific instances or blocking all NSFW, sometimes over half of “all” is porn.

I’m not anti porn but I find it hard to wrap my head around a user who is equally enjoying half their feed being hardcore videos, 1/4 memes and 1/4 news, all equally and simultaneously. Like “I’m on the bus reading a news article about the economy then I’ll check out 30 seconds of FP blowjobs and then oh, someone posted about a labor strike”? Who is that?

Esta entrada fue editada (hoy, 19:29)
in reply to ki4jgt

I'd say it's the exact opposite. Porn has never been as mainstream as it is now, movies and video games have never been as violent. I remember that in the mid 2000s, GTA and Call of Duty were literally demonized because of the depiction of violence.
Now onlyfans modells openly collaborate with mainstream musicians and Call of Duty has stayed just as violent while appealing directly and openly to children. I am on lemmy.world, if I sort my feed by "Hot" and include all instances, I count about 2 or 3 NSFW post per page on average. And I'm not talking some cosplays, I'm talking hardcore BDSM stuff.

This goes into the realm of conspiracy theories, but it certainly feels like advertisers have some sort of agreement to stay away from controversial topics, keep the viewers minds clean and neutral. So that when it becomes necessary or more important profitable, they're easier to sway one way or the other. Don't think, just enjoy and consume please, and don't forget to hate who we tell you to hate.

Asklemmy reshared this.

in reply to LouNeko

less about advertising and more about being cut off from payment processing networks. And that is being driven by anti-porn lobbying group Collective Shout

thepinknews.com/2025/08/04/visa-mastercard-adult-purchases/

in reply to LouNeko
Google AI gave me a summary that other people across the Internet are noticing the same pattern. It said that, because of the massive amount of open availability, people are feeling desensitized and disconnected. As if adult content has lost all meaning. Mostly, because consumerism has placed it everywhere, without any connection or romantic context. That people are actively avoiding it, because it feels empty.
in reply to Gamma

Since you used the word define. . . We're in modern times (as we always are) and Anthropology says that 20-somethings set current cultural standards. You can do the math from that.

Saying that this generation is lazy is far different than asking why this generation prefers certain things over others.

Esta entrada fue editada (hoy, 19:11)
in reply to Gamma

Research is showing that young people are having less sex, doing fewer drugs, and drinking less alcohol. Soda consumption is down. Restaurants are receiving fewer visitors.

Young people set modern culture shifts. With all due respect, they are to blame. The question I'm asking is, why? Not about all issues. Not negging them about their choices. Just curious why the aversion to swear words and nudity.

in reply to ki4jgt

It's funny, because I self censored and it triggered someone a few months ago on Lemmy.

It's even more wild people are getting offended by stupid things like this imho. Almost like they need to be acknowledged to be reminded they're normal.

The funny thing is, I probably swear more than anyone I know in real life most the time but I don't feel like I need to make it part of my personality lol

Esta entrada fue editada (hoy, 19:23)
in reply to auzy1

Cognitive dissonance.

I didn't really question it until all the posts on one of my favorite Tarot subs started blurring out all the nude cards on their readings. Then I remembered seeing adult fan art on Mastodon, and wondered why I wasn't seeing it on Lemmy. Amazon censoring curse words in subtitles was the final straw.

I hear the word fuck 40 times per day from kids (under 18) and adults. And I can't read it in my subtitles?

Esta entrada fue editada (hoy, 19:28)
in reply to ki4jgt

Oh no. Who gives a sh**

Seems like you're making a big deal about nothing...

I've probably come more people whining about this and pretending like it's about government control or whatever, as people getting offended by swear words

It's just as bad, if not worse because you're trying to control freedom of speech. People can choose to censor if they wish.

You can choose to use an uncensored source

Esta entrada fue editada (hoy, 20:01)
in reply to ki4jgt
it's not a generational issue, but a marketing issue. It's not "ad-friendly". It's also a fascism thing. Performative moralizing and pearl clutching that rightoids use to smokescreen their pedophilia and their other favorite forms of rape. If they can construct an image of being hallowed crusaders of family values, it makes predation easier. because, you know, camouflage. It doesn't even have to work or be convincing for everyone; all they have to do is hijack the ideologically-possessed simps who line up to suck the same fuhrer's cock and the flock will immediately surround the wolf to defend them from any scary accusations, and even shield them from accountability when they ARE caught.
in reply to ki4jgt

I see two forces working in that direction.

One is advertisements. If you run a social media platform or website or anything similar, and hope to display ads, you better not show anything they don't want associated with their brand.

The second is the rise of political movements (you know which ones) that have nothing better to offer than "modesty" and "traditional values" (whatever that means) as ways to fix the issues society faces.

in reply to ki4jgt

Beware of complaining about "this generation" - it definitely means you might be over the hill.

Different cohorts are exposed to and brought up with different experiences and media. People brought up in a media landscape that's personally produced for social media, and subject to scrutiny globally... Are more concerned with what's socially acceptable. Is that really surprising?

This concept has been called "profilicty", but was foreshadowed in the 70s/80s by the philosopher Guy Debord when he said:

"We've gone from a society of being, to knowing, to appearing to be".


If you're raised on videos of people who have hired luxury cars, and mansions to appear like they've made it, whilst others are torn down with a barrage of comments for saying the wrong thing.... You too might worry about appearances (and your status).

But most young people are fine, they're good in fact. They're still new. Don't worry about them. They're just young people... And don't believe the media.

Esta entrada fue editada (hoy, 19:35)

Asklemmy reshared this.

in reply to DarkCloud
Beware of complaining about “this generation” - it definitely means you might be over the hill.


Oh no! What can I do about that?

But most young people are fine, they’re good in fact. They’re still new. Don’t worry about them. They’re just young people… And don’t believe the media.


I didn't say anything bad about them.

in reply to ki4jgt

Maybe this is you generalizing people judging only from controlled social networks, like Instagram that censors out absolutely everything except hate speech.

As far as I see where I live kids nowadays are very much the opposite of prudish, maybe too much at that. 13 year olds barely knowing anything about life and trying their best to brag about how many people they're fucking while swearing like they're characters from a GTA script.

in reply to ki4jgt

i don't think i'm particularly prudish. i'll routinely go out to clubs and do demos with like nothing on, but that's in a setting where it's expected. i also appreciate not having sex shoehorned into everything i watch or read.

like yeah it's a facet of existence, but it's not everything. i'd rather have it be meaningful and intentional instead of everywhere.

in reply to ki4jgt
I am a big movie fan and watch a lot of movies from all different periods and the amount of nudity in mainstream R rated movies has fallen to almost 0. In the 70's, 80's and 90's nudity in mainstream movies was pretty common. I can't even think of the last big movie that had nudity in it. Something clearly shifted but I am not sure what.
in reply to ki4jgt

The problems you're talking about in the OP are purely monetary. Advertisers don't want it so media/content can't do it and survive.

The upcoming generation are behaving less unruly these days I think for 2 reasons :

  • Everything is being recorded and shared all the time. You fart in an elevator and you might go viral. God only knows the fear you'd experience waking up hungover after a party in this world.

-Regular rebellion against the previous generation. We had eminem, limp bizkit, rage against the machine, Bart Simpson, an entire barrage of "fuck authority" as a culture. Only real way to rebel against that is "fuck yeah, authority".