@liiwi @glyph They might not "learn" without the expensive RLHF cycles iocaine keeps poisioning, but they certainly rat everything you communicate to one to the surveillance capitalists who own and operate them.
I saw someone talking (with actual practical authority) about usability testing methodologies and they quickly pivoted to, "This is kind of like how LLMs reason... we can't quite see it." Like, no, those programs aren't "reasoning" at all. Similar shades of the "born" language... these are still very very much not people. Words matter, still.
Closest thing that's been made so far is to stick a new partial model to the current base one, but the base and the appendix must be specifically built to allow for it. Low-Rank Adaptation it's called (LoRA, not to be confused with the radio frequency one)
Glyph
in reply to Thomas Fuchs • • •Jaakko Niemi
in reply to Glyph • • •Dr. Bruce Simpson
in reply to Jaakko Niemi • • •Paul McAleer
in reply to Thomas Fuchs • • •Carlos Solís
in reply to Thomas Fuchs • •Luna Dragofelis ΘΔ🏳️⚧️🐱 likes this.
Thomas Fuchs
in reply to Carlos Solís • • •Luna Dragofelis ΘΔ🏳️⚧️🐱 likes this.
Carlos Solís
in reply to Thomas Fuchs • •Dr. Bruce Simpson reshared this.
Carlos Solís
in reply to Carlos Solís • •Random ⁂ likes this.
Thomas Fuchs
in reply to Carlos Solís • • •Carlos Solís likes this.
Kelsey Jordahl
in reply to Thomas Fuchs • • •